![]() Well known for its mythically exaggerated destruction and an archaeological find situation unique in Europe, Rungholt is a prominent example of the effects of massive human intervention in the northern German coastal region that continue to this day. Within the framework of two interdisciplinary projects by the German Research Foundation (DFG), i.e., the RUNGHOLT project and the Wadden Sea project in the ROOTS Cluster of Excellence, research has been conducted for several years on the medieval cultural landscape disappeared in the Wadden Sea. Interdisciplinary cooperation as the key to success Thus, they can now finally clarify a much-discussed research question that has been going on for over 100 years. (This article was written by Hidemasa Yoshizawa and Takahiro Takenouchi.Using a combination of geoscientific and archaeological methods, researchers from Kiel University (CAU), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU), the Center for Baltic and Scandinavian Archaeology (ZBSA), and the State Archaeology Department Schleswig-Holstein (ALSH), both in Schleswig, have now succeeded in locating the site of the Rungholt church. ![]() “The waves could have been amplified gradually by the time when they reached Japan.” “Changes in atmospheric pressure push the surface of the sea and after they pass through, the sea surface rises, causing high waves,” Imamura said. Taro Kakinuma, an associate professor of tsunami and coastal engineering at Kagoshima University, pointed out that changes in atmospheric pressure could amplify waves on the sea surface.Īccording to Kakinuma, there are reports that tsunami due to atmospheric pressure changes were observed in California in the United States and elsewhere after the massive 1883 Krakatau eruption in Indonesia.įumihiko Imamura, a professor of tsunami engineering and the head of Tohoku University’s International Research Institute of Disaster Science, also suggested the shock waves might have changed the tidal levels.Ī tsunami normally occurs in a cycle of 20 minutes to a duration of one hour, but this time the cycle was as short as a few minutes to 10 minutes or so. Miyaoka said whether increases in atmospheric pressure were related to the tidal level changes is unclear, but commented, “We have never observed such a phenomenon.” The JMA revealed that at almost the same time as the changes in tidal levels started, the eruption’s shock waves passed through various locations, increasing atmospheric pressure by two hectopascals or so. Japan is located about 8,000 kilometers from the eruption area, but saw bigger tidal level changes along its shores. “We think that this time the tidal level changes were different from normal tsunami.”Ī tsunami usually emanates from an eruption location, but small tidal level changes, ranging from 0.1 meters to 0.3 meters, were observed at Saipan, a commonwealth of the United States, and elsewhere, much closer to the Tonga islands than Japan. “It took longer to make decisions, but we issued warnings from the perspective of disaster prevention,” said Kazuki Miyaoka, the JMA's senior coordinator for seismological information, at a news conference in the early morning of Jan. It was extremely difficult for the JMA to make an assessment. Tsunami warnings are normally issued after tsunami heights and arrival times are predicted based on an earthquake scale, location of the epicenter and its depth of focus.īut this time, the JMA issued its warnings based on data recorded at tidal observatories at various locations. The JMA issued tsunami warnings and advisories at 12:15 a.m. ![]() 16, increases of more than one meter in the sea level were observed in Amami city, located on the island of Amami-Oshima island, in Kagoshima Prefecture. The JMA expected that the small tidal level changes would occur at Chichijima island, part of the Ogasawara island chain south of Tokyo, around 10:30 p.m.īut tidal level changes started to be observed at various locations across Japan from around 8 p.m., two and a half hours earlier than expected. 15, about six hours after the eruption near the Tonga islands, the meteorological agency announced that “there is no need to worry about tsunami danger” although it predicted slight fluctuations in the sea level. The Japan Meteorological Agency was forced to make decisions on public warnings that differed from ones made in the event of a tsunami.Ī little after 7 p.m. It was the first time that an underwater volcanic eruption abroad caused surges in the sea level that affected Japan. 15 caused the higher tidal levels seen along Japan's Pacific coastline. Tsunami experts theorize that shock waves produced after a massive underwater volcanic eruption near Tonga on Jan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |